I tweeted a very brief negative review (”Shpathetic”) of Cirque Du Soleil’s new show at the Chicago Theater, “Banana Shpeel,” and I feel obligated to expand more… besides, since I can’t get my money back, maybe I can keep you from wasting yours.
First, the obligatory Recitation of Credentials (all of the hate mail we get at WWDTM starts this way, too): I love me some Cirque Du Soleil. I saw their second touring tent show on a beach in Santa Monica in 1988, and have since then seen — let me see — four of their permanent shows in Vegas, one in Disney World, another touring edition, and a few more on videotape. I celebrated my birthday last year by taking the whole family to see “Alegria,” and we walked out humming the trapeze act. And, in fact, the four true circus acts in this show (two jugglers, two gymnast/strength acts) are up to the usual Cirque standards.
… but the rest of the show just sucked. Chris Jones of the Chicago Tribune had a very interesting piece exploring the commercial rationale for the show: they want something they can tour to the large proscenium rental houses that are available in each major city (many of them, like the Pasadena Civic or the Wang in Boston are places where WWDTM now plays, so I know them well.) He also wrote about the creative turmoil… apparently, it was planned as a real musical, with book and actors, but that wasn’t working out and they cut the songs and fired the actors. They should have scrapped the whole thing and started again.
The show was “written” and directed by David Shiner, a very talented new vaudevillian who I saw years ago on Broadway in a double bill with Bill Irwin, called “Fool Moon,” Shiner, silent but otherwise un-clownlike in dress or demeanor, specialized in audience participation… he’d bring somebody up on stage, then somebody else, and somehow manage to coerce and cajole them into doing rather amazingly funny things. His demeanor, as I remember it, was mischievous, sometimes a little scary — but never cruel.
That cruelty is all that he’s got to offer here. The “framing device,” such as it is, is auditions for a producer’s new show. Two speaking clowns, whose schtick is that they hate each other, introduce the acts — more clowns, whom the first clowns hate, and who hate them in return. There were some fleeting moments of humor — the “World’s Oldest Mime” got some laughs — but by the long clown set-piece with an audience “volunteer” at the end of the first act (strange, the production photos feature the same “audience member” we saw) made my wife and myself stare downwards, hoping for it to be over. Can’t remember the last time I felt that at the circus.
I am usually quiet about the bad theater I see; I have committed enough myself (and probably still do, some weeks) to know that those who make it are trying their best and don’t need somebody else out there on the internets trashing their work. But Cirque du Soleil is smart enough, and successful enough, that they should have known better than to foist this one on the public. Whatever they would have lost, financially, in canceling the engagement is less than the blow I think their reputation will take when more Cirque-lovers like me walk out of the theater, actually angry…